Carbon dating incorrect updating client computers with win 2016 server
” “Why do professors break laws of reason known for 2000 years? Jo has been interviewed on The John Batchelor Show (NY)   and with Michael Smith on 4BC and on Global Cooling Radio.
” This site or Jo Nova has been mentioned or referenced by tried to disparage her with an ad hominem.
For those of you that are lucky enough to own the original paperwork and documentation, we all envy you.
For those that aren’t as lucky, now is the time to own your own expertly reproduced Documents that make great Novelty items for display purposes.
Answer: None.) We paid to find a crisis, and we got what we paid for.
Thousands of skeptics are working pro bono because they are outraged.
Did they forget to tell you that at least two Nobel Prize winning physicists are skeptics, and four NASA Astronauts, not to mention some of the top climatologists?
Meanwhile they say 97% of climate experts agree, but they don’t say that that’s only 75 people.
When all the duplicates and errors removed, there were even more names the second time, including 9,000 Ph Ds?
Then I found out that there was another side to the story, and I was shocked. Over billion dollars has been fed into one side of a scientific question, while almost none has been put into auditing the reports, checking the results, or investigating other theories.
(Which National Institute do climate skeptics apply for a job at?
In other words, the ice core graph shows that temperature controls the carbon dioxide levels.
It’s possible that CO2 provides some extra push (amplification) but if it does, its effect is so small that it can’t be seen in those graphs.
Retired scientists and engineers and teams of helpers are independently auditing official reports. In 2009, world carbon markets turned over $130 billion dollars.